Now or in two years?
The Intel DX11 control issues with huge titles. There is no question about it. Intel is better for each core that AMD is still out. AMD vs. Intel Computer
But .. DX12 and multi-core game can change. You have something to say about being able to use all the cores in a very limited extent that FX8 and FX9 series when the budget was still not a good choice although effectively.
And a new CPU from AMD such. Zen, what standards we have not seen the details yet, just read some really exciting performance.
The problem is that AMD is not really much of CPU for the past 4-5 years. Either way, but money's not bad ZEN series APU. But it means with their top line CPU. The top line CPU Let's just old. Very old ... very inefficient.
If you can handle 8 threads fact that a load with a load of FX8 sure you get some performance. Bad things do not make much use of the 8 threads. This was / is the problem AMD. According to their low basic software core performance and Intel's low that they are lazy.
Only now are we finally seeing some software before you can push 8 cores. And the performance gap between AMD and Intel with DX12 things better spread the load. <h11
To put it this way, software, games, made 4-5 years ago do not work on a FX8 / 9 Series. That they run but you get less performance on Intel. Although the 2016 games and software. We're talking about a difference. We now find that we are able to use the games and software actually all cores. FX 8/9 and is close to the Line of Actual performance Intel i5 series.
Now that is why I ask now or two years. Because the saddle can be a CPU that is head to head with Intel. Can I, we say that has not seen any standards or tests.
So Intel still has control issues.
in the future? Hard to say! AMD can actually pull yourself. They can find the same with Intel. It is very possible.